Skip Navigation

Miller Miller

Technology law

Technology law safeguards innovation, privacy, and intellectual property in an ever-evolving digital world. It ensures compliance, protects against cyber threats, and fosters ethical practices, helping businesses thrive while navigating complex tech landscapes.

Overview

Technology law is an evolving field that intersects with various legal disciplines, including privacy law, intellectual property law, contract law, and cybersecurity. With the increasing integration of digital technologies into everyday life, legal systems are working to keep pace with the rapid changes in technology. In the United States, both state and federal laws regulate the technological landscape, though each jurisdiction has different approaches. This section explores technology law in Michigan, Ohio, and under federal regulations, providing an in-depth understanding of the legal challenges and frameworks in each area.

Data Privacy

Michigan's approach to data privacy has been proactive, especially in protecting consumers from identity theft. The Michigan Identity Theft Protection Act (MCL 445.61) was one of the state’s primary responses to growing concerns over personal data breaches. The Act imposes several requirements on businesses that store or manage sensitive consumer information. One of the key provisions is that businesses must notify individuals of any security breaches that expose their personal information. This law ensures that consumers are informed in a timely manner, which is critical for preventing or mitigating the effects of identity theft.

Additionally, Michigan’s data privacy landscape is supported by the Consumer Protection Act (MCL 445.901-445.922), which governs deceptive business practices, including improper handling of personal information. These regulations are intended to safeguard individuals from fraudulent actions and provide them with legal recourse in case of violations.

Michigan does not have a comprehensive, state-wide data privacy law like California's CCPA, but its regulations around data breach notifications and identity theft are important components of its data privacy regime. Given the increasing concern about digital privacy across the country, it is possible that Michigan may expand its laws to address broader privacy protections in the future.

Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity in Michigan has gained significant attention due to the increasing frequency of cyber-attacks and the role of sensitive data in modern business. The state has implemented several cybersecurity frameworks to safeguard both private and public sector operations. One such initiative is the Michigan Cybersecurity Protection Act, which governs the protection of state government entities' sensitive information. The Act requires state agencies to adopt certain cybersecurity practices, particularly around the use of cloud computing, data encryption, and security protocols for public records.

In the private sector, Michigan law also emphasizes the importance of cybersecurity for businesses handling consumer information. The Michigan Cybersecurity Council was established to advise state government agencies on best practices for improving cybersecurity. The Council works in conjunction with both local and federal cybersecurity agencies to ensure that Michigan businesses comply with national cybersecurity standards and remain resilient in the face of evolving cyber threats.

Michigan law also emphasizes data security audits, which require companies to conduct regular assessments of their cybersecurity measures. These audits are essential for identifying vulnerabilities in data security systems and improving response strategies before incidents occur.

Digital Contracts and E-Signatures

Michigan follows the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), which was adopted in 1999, and ensures that electronic contracts, signatures, and records are legally valid. Under UETA (MCL 450.831), an electronic signature or contract cannot be denied validity solely because it is in electronic form. This law reflects the growing importance of digital transactions in a variety of sectors, from e-commerce to real estate and healthcare. The act guarantees that Michigan businesses and consumers can confidently engage in electronic contracts and transactions.

Additionally, Michigan has provisions for electronic records, ensuring that documents signed digitally are treated the same as paper documents in court and other legal proceedings. This law encourages businesses to streamline operations, reduce paperwork, and take advantage of electronic communication.

Case Law in Michigan

The Michigan judiciary has also contributed to the development of technology law through important case law. One significant case is People v. Hall, 499 Mich. 446 (2016), in which the Michigan Supreme Court addressed the use of digital evidence in criminal trials. The case involved the seizure and use of digital data (text messages, photos, etc.) from a suspect’s mobile phone. The court ruled that digital evidence could be used in criminal investigations, even if it involved accessing private data, as long as proper legal procedures were followed. This case emphasized the importance of handling digital evidence with care and the need for law enforcement to comply with constitutional safeguards when dealing with digital materials.

Works Cited

  • Michigan Identity Theft Protection Act, MCL 445.61.
  • Michigan Cybersecurity Protection Act.
  • People v. Hall, 499 Mich. 446 (2016).
  • Ohio Data Protection Act (ODPA).
  • Ohio Revised Code § 1349.19.
  • State v. Smith, 124 Ohio St. 3d 163 (2009).
  • Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030.
  • Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA).
  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), 17 U.S.C. § 1201.
  • Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018).